With the concerns stated at the end of Report #1, Bill Womble telephoned Mr. Ivy Owen for an appointment to meet with
the FMAC New Field Committee. (It had been decided during the first meeting that we would get together again after
the Club had time to make some decisions.) A meeting was set for Tuesday morning, October 6, 2009 at 9:00 AM. Those
present at the meeting were Mr. Ivy Owen, the Executive Director of the Fort Chaffee Redevelopment Authority, and a member
of the "Chaffee Crossing Land Development Board", and Mr. Larry Evans, Director of Operations for the Chaffee Crossing Land
Development Project, Ron Roberts and Bill Womble.
After a warm and cordial reception we got down to business. Ron had brought his laptop with the PowerPoint
Presentation that was made to club members during the September meeting. The purpose of bringing that presentation
was to discuss not only the concerns mentioned during the club meeting, but to be able to point out the specific area of the
property in which we were interested and to display in graphic terms, the size of the piece of land that our hobby needs, as
well as the over-fly areas.
I believe both Mr. Owen and Mr. Evans were impressed with both the amount of preparation and the progress that we had made
on our end. After talking a bit about our safety concerns and showing them the AMA minimum recommendations for safe
flying, as well as the AMA's suggested field layout including safety fencing, spectator areas, pit area, runways, over flight
area and parking, they began to realize that we needed more than just a "few acres" in which to build a flying field.
The plot of land that we had been talking with them about, the 1100 by 3600 area, comes out to about 90 acres! They
were somewhat surprised that we needed that much, but did not appear to be overly concerned.
We told them that we really did not need 90 acres of cleared land for our use, in fact our present field (shown on the right)
has only about 28 acres of "immediate area", but that we did need to have the right to over-fly the surrounding area of the
cleared land that we would be using. We came to a mutual agreement that about 30 acres is what we would need cleared.
They both thought, and the committee agreed, that if we were to receive 30 acres as "ours", we could "share" the
surrounding areas as long as the use of the surrounding areas would not present a safety issue and would allow entrance to
retrieve downed aircraft.
With those discussions out of the way, we proceeded to voice our concerns about the "100 year flood plane". Both of
them were surprised to hear that. To the best of their knowledge the entire area is NOT within the 100 year flood plane.
They were, and are, planning business, commercial and housing areas within that same elevation plane of less than 12
inches of elevation difference from the property we are hoping to gain the use of. Mr. Owen is going to check on that
and contact Bill once he finds the answer. We did talk a little about "just in case" it turns out that the land is
within the 100 year flood plane, which we thought might still be a "doable" thing if we raised the level of the pad for the
shelter and any buildings constructed.
We then told Mr. Owen and Mr. Evans that several members of the club were ex-military and had experience driving bulldozers
and other heavy equipment, and that we would be willing to supply the "man hours" if we could gain access to the equipment
needed to remove the trees, level and roll the ground and put up fencing.
We discussed the use of the existing gravel roads for access to the property and that was not a problem with them.
In fact, should the commercial development of the area near the two ponds become a reality, the gravel roads would be paved by
the county!
It appears that there may be (most likely will be) a "nature trail" (yellow dotted line in the slide at left) kind of
winding among the trees left to grow, which would be on the extreme Western part of the 90 acre plot. We assured
them that would not be a problem because we would rarely fly that far out and even if we did, and if the airplane were to
crash into the trees, the trees would naturally protect anyone on the trail. Besides, that trail would be well
outside of the 2500 feet required by the AMA for safety reasons.
So what it all boils down to is... the only hold up might be the "100 year flood plane" thing and whether we would be
willing to take the land even if was in the flood plane. As has been mentioned several times before, both Mr. Evans
and Mr. Owen believe that we would be an asset to the Chaffee Crossing area. The land has been designated as a "Park
and Recreation" area, and an "Airpark" (whether public or private) would fit nicely into that designation. They
further believe that the high number of visitors and pilots we have during the year at our events, would spend some money
in that area and would talk about the area. They really want us there!